Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice

By David de Cremer, Constantine Sedikides. 2005

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4418e1b83889541580dd1959582011bace89524e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Moderating effects of job insecurity in the relationships between procedural justice and employee well-being: Gender differences (2005, background): “Recent findings from experimental studies (de Cremer & Sedikides, 2005 ) have shown high self-uncertainty (high self-esteem instability, self-doubt, and self-concept unclarity) to be related to strong affective, cognitive, and behavioural reactions to perceived procedural justice.”
Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review (2006, background): “Three studies asked participants to list three positive aspects of themselves (Van den Bos, 2001, study 2) and one asked them to think about these positive characteristics for a few minutes (De Cremer & Sedikides, 2005, study 6).”
Self-concept Clarity Mediates the Relation between Stress and Subjective Well-being (2011, background): “Self-concept clarity is inversely related to indices of psychological distress (eg, anxiety, negative affect, rumination) and is positively related to subjective well-being (Campbell et al, 1996 ; De Cremer & Sedikides, 2005 ; Lavallee & Campbell, 1995 ; Slotter, Gardner, & Finkel, 2010 ).”
Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults' and youths' willingness to collaborate with police (2015, background): “In a series of experimental studies with adults, DeCremer and Sedikides (2005) demonstrated that self-uncertainty plays a particularly important role in responses to variations in procedural justice.”
Is More Fairness Always Preferred? Self-Esteem Moderates Reactions to Procedural Justice (2007, background): “…et al., 2004) found that reactions to the fairness of a leader were stronger for people with low rather than high state social selfesteem, and De Cremer and Sedikides (2005) reported that reactions to procedural justice were stronger for those with greater self-uncertainty (people who also tend…”
Victim Willingness to Report Crime to Police: Does Procedural Justice or Outcome Matter Most? (2014, background): “Our results support the growing number of studies that suggest that procedural justice will have more salience for those who may be more uncertain about their status in society (Colquitt et al., 2012; De Cremer & Sedikides, 2005; Murphy, 2013b).”
How perceptions of fairness can change (2013, background): “…uncertainty about whether they can trust their managers (Jones & Martens, 2009), uncertainty about themselves and how they compare to others (De Cremer & Sedikides, 2005; Thau, Aquino, & Wittek, 2007), and uncertainty caused by aspects of the work environment that interfere with interpersonal…”
Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality (2013, background): “Indeed, related research suggests that various forms of self-focus increase the extent to which people’s fairnessbased judgments are influenced by the morality of the way they are treated by others (Van Prooijen et al., 2008; Van Prooijen & Zwenk, 2009; see also De Cremer & Sedikides, 2005).”