An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Sexual harassment in higher education – a systematic review (2020, background): “…education tend to have a focus on individuals/ women, legal entities and a structure for handling complaints (case management), while the perspectives of perpetrators (Howard 2009; also cf. Pina, Gannon, and Saunders 2009) and the ramifications for the broader work environment usually are missing.”
An overview of the literature on antecedents, perceptions and behavioural consequences of sexual harassment (2012, background): “…three distinct forms with regard to perpetrator status: sexual harassment by superiors, sexual harassment by coworkers (peer-to-peer) and sexual harassment by subordinates (Cleveland & Kerst, 1993; for a full review of the academic and legal definitions of sexual harassment see Pina et al., 2009).”
Women’s experiences with general and sexual harassment in online video games: Rumination, organizational responsiveness, withdrawal, and coping strategies (2017, background): “Our results also support previous theorizing that indicates sexual harassment is conceptually and experientially distinct from other forms of harassment (Pina et al., 2009; Pryor and Whalen, 1996).”
Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century. (2018, background): “225 of individual training (Salisbury & Jaffe, 1996) or treatment (Pina et al., 2009) for offenders.”