Value innovation in business markets: Breaking the industry recipe
By P. Matthyssens, K. Vandenbempt, L. Berghman. 2006
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a25986dae1e51c7c91fdf642d5af4a45cea67f56
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Christian Kowalkowski
- Heiko Gebauer
- P. Matthyssens
- K. Vandenbempt
- Andy Neely
- Morgan Swink
- Lars Witell
- L. Berghman
In Strategy and Management
- Christian Kowalkowski
- Heiko Gebauer
- Andy Neely
- O. Benedettini
- Morgan Swink
- Lars Witell
- Anders Gustafsson
- K. Vandenbempt
Citations in the corpus
- Examining the influence of service additions on manufacturing firms' bankruptcy likelihood (2017, background): “…services fail to consistently exert a direct effect on company performance, in contrast to the positive effect assumed so far by the mainstream conceptual literature (e.g. Mathieu, 2001; Oliva and Kallenberg, 2003; Gebauer et al., 2006; Mathyssens et al., 2006; Penttinen and Palmer, 2007).”
- Competitive advantage through service differentiation by manufacturing companies (2011, background): “Services lead to co-creation of value based on the competencies of the company and the customer (Matthyssens et al., 2006; Vargo and Lusch, 2008), which leads to resources that are unique and hard to imitate (Wernerfelt, 1984).”
- Value innovation, deliberate learning mechanisms and information from supply chain partners (2012, background): “research on absorptive capacity) from its original R&D focus to other types of innovation (Lichtenthaler & Lichtenthaler, 2009; Matthyssens et al., 2006; Tether & Tajar, 2008).”
- Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach (2013, background): “A new menatal model implies not only learning, but also the willingness and ability to unlearn (Sinkula 2002) and reject obsolete routines, which should lead in turn to the adaptation of more effective behaviors (Matthyssens et al., 2006).”