Political Ideologies of CEOs

By M. K. Chin, Donald C. Hambrick, Linda Klebe Treviño. 2013

866 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a22574b2c3655f3fa16fa89f98ad104974585094

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

CEO Greed, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Organizational Resilience to Systemic Shocks (2020, methodology): “The use of such a composite CSR measure reflects the idea that stakeholder relations can improve both by increasing stakeholder engagement and by minimizing negative externalities (Chin et al., 2013).4 Independent variable.”
Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, background): “The main units of analysis are typically individuals considered as members of specific employee categories such as job seekers (Jones et al., 2014), prospect employees (Turban and Greening, 1997), or executives (Chin et al., 2013).”
Working While Liberal/Conservative: A Review of Political Ideology in Organizations (2020, background): “Archival indicators of donations comprise the dominant approach within the organizational sciences because they provide behavioral and accessible data for hard-to-survey populations (e.g., executives; Chin et al., 2013).”
The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review (2017, background): “…avoidance may explain individual inertia in relation to engagement in climate change initiatives but do not test this effect empirically; Chin, Hambrick, and Trevino (2013) suggest that CEOs’ orientation toward liberalism or conservatism is reflected in the more or less contingent…”