Where Mathematics Comes From
By George Lakoff, Rafael E. Núñez. 2000
632 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0aefd7f14796c021a285d6bed17162c3a7e484a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- David Tall
- Rosana Nogueira de Lima
- Ed Dubinsky
- Jack Pegg
- Kirk Weller
- Eddie M. Gray
- Anne Brown
- Luis Radford
Citations in the corpus
- Gestures, Speech, and the Sprouting of Signs: A Semiotic-Cultural Approach to Students' Types of Generalization (2003, background): “Although I consider the path followed by Nunez (2000) and Lakoff and Nunez (2000) rather enlightening, I want to emphasize that the students’ embodiment of experience, as I take it here, is not seen as resulting from a biological origin.”
- THINKING THROUGH THREE WORLDS OF MATHEMATICS (2004, background): “In the second development, Lakoff and colleagues theorized that human embodiment suffused all human thinking, culminating in an analysis of Where Mathematics Comes From (Lakoff & Nunez, 2000).”
- How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design (2006, methodology): “Such educational methods nicely leverage the bodily basis of mathematical concepts for learning [ 39 ].”
- Relationships between embodied objects and symbolic procepts: an explanatory theory of success and failure in mathematics (2004, methodology): “We use the term ‘embodied object’ in a manner similar to the theory of Lakoff and his colleagues who speak of ‘embodied cognitive science’ (Lakoff & Johnson, 1999; Lakoff & Nunez, 2000 ).”
- Reflections on Theories of Learning (2006, background): “Recently Lakoff and Núñez (2000) even developed the ideas embodied metaphors so as to offer an account of the discipline of mathematics.”
- Introducing Three Worlds of Mathematics (2004, background): “Lakoff and his colleagues assert, in their own broad meaning, that everything is embodied (Lakoff & Johnson, 1999, Lakoff & Nunez 2000).”
- The fundamental cycle of concept construction underlying various theoretical frameworks (2005, background): “Others, such as the embodied theory of Lakoff and Nunez (2000) or the situated learning of Lave and Wenger (1990) paint in broader brush-strokes, featuring the underlying biological or social structures involved.”
- Visualizing Thought (2011, background): “Similarly, some kinds of maps add information not directly visible in the environment, such as contour lines for topography of the ground or for weather fronts.”
- Some Historical Issues and Paradoxes Regarding the Concept of Infinity: An Apos Analysis: Part 2 (2005, background): “Lakoff and Núñez (2000) maintain that our understanding of mathematical notions of infinity is based on the establishment of a conceptual metaphor, the Basic Metaphor of Infinity (p. 159), that links the target domain of processes that go on and on with the source domain of completed finite…”