Computer-Assisted Instruction in Support of Beginning Reading Instruction: A Review

By H. Blok, Ron Oostdam, M. Otter, M. Overmaat. 2002

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fd3d573c4306f9f04f21de7f93daf59401bb188

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Annie Magnan
2. Jean Écalle
3. C. Girard
4. William R. Penuel
5. Roberto Agodini

In Education

1. Annie Magnan
2. Jean Écalle
3. C. Girard
4. William R. Penuel
5. Roberto Agodini
6. B. Means
7. L. Shepard

In Statistics and Probability

1. Harold S. Javitz
2. Roberto Agodini

Citations in the corpus

• Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies (2013, background): “Blok et al. (2002) analysed 42 published quantitative studies in English and Dutch on the effectiveness of using computers to teach beginning reading to children aged 5–12.”
• Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort (2007, background): “Both qualitative research syntheses (Schacter 2001; Sivin-Kachala 1998) and formal meta-analyses of these studies (Blok et al. 2002; Kulik and Kulik 1991; Kulik 1994; Kulik 2003; Murphy et al. 2001; Pearson et al. 2005; Waxman et al. 2003) found that computer-assisted instruction in reading and math”