Judgments of learning: Methods, data, and theory.

By Matthew G. Rhodes. 2016

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f07be288780b830ef5b2f2efd4845f37f891284

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Michael L. Mueller
2. John Dunlosky
3. Anique B. H. de Bruin
4. Katherine A. Rawson
5. M. Loon
6. Allison J. Jaeger
7. Tamara van Gog
8. Michelle L. Rivers

Citations in the corpus

• How beliefs can impact judgments of learning: Evaluating analytic processing theory with beliefs about fluency (2017, background): “Given the relevance of JOLs to applications, these judgments have become one of the most widely investigated of all monitoring judgments (for reviews, see Dunlosky & Metcalfe, 2009; Rhodes, 2016).”