Social identity processes and children’s ethnic prejudice

By D. Nesdale. 2004

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e4013a198befd8468344b233f2d201f5a65230f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

How Peer Norms of Inclusion and Exclusion Predict Children's Interest in Cross‐Ethnic Friendships (2014, background): “Prior work in social psychology (Brewer, 1999) and developmental psychology (Aboud, 2003; Nesdale, 2004) indicate that favorability toward the in-group and derogation of the out-group often function as distinct processes.”
Origins and Development of Morality (2015, background): “Within the intergroup attitudes literature, there is debate about whether ingroup preference is necessarily linked to outgroup derogation (Nesdale, 2004).”
Children’s cross-ethnic friendships: Why are they less stable than same-ethnic friendships? (2013, background): “This effect of peer group norms has been shown in the context of bullying behaviour (Ojala & Nesdale, 2004) and ethnic prejudice (Nesdale, Maass, Durkin, & Griffith, 2005).”
Fair Resource Allocation Among Children and Adolescents: The Role of Group and Developmental Processes (2017, background): “approaches to social identity (24) and group dynamics (11), and in conjunction with social domain theory (25, 26), the SRD perspective provides a guide for investigating moral and social-cognitive reasoning in the context of group processes.”
School bullying from a sociocultural perspective (2018, background): “Such findings have typically been explained using mainstream social psychological theories such as Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and Social Identity Development Theory (Nesdale, 2004) which examine membership, identification, and conformity within groups.”
Peer Relationships in Childhood (2013, background): “For example, researchers have found a negative relation between peer group membership and externalizing/internalizing problems (Newman et al., 2007). Likewise, Prinstein and La Greca (2002) argued that being a member of a given peer group strongly enhances selfconcept and may protect against the dev”
Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs (2014, background): “…and social-cognitive abilities such as classification skills and perspective taking (Aboud, 1988; Bigler & Liben, 2007), the development of social identity (Nesdale, 2004), or moral decision making (Killen & Rutland, 2011) are crucial contributors to intergroup attitude development in children.”
A Developmental Science Approach to Reducing Prejudice and Social Exclusion: Intergroup Processes, Social‐Cognitive Development, and Moral Reasoning (2015, background): “Indeed, we have reviewed many intervention strategies that are known to be effective in childhood when prejudice has the potential to develop but is not fully formed or entrenched (Aboud, 2003; Cameron, Alvarez, Ruble, & Fuligni, 2001; Nesdale, 2004, 2008).”