Appraisals cause experienced emotions: Experimental evidence

By Ira J. Roseman, A. Evdokas. 2004

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e3d6786e14317eb5e5d15619d0d3500541bef18

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Helpful Hopefulness: The Effect of Future Positive Emotions on Consumption (2011, unknown): “This result was expected given research indicating that the appraisals elicit emotion experience (Ellsworth and Scherer 2003; Roseman and Evdokas 2004).”
Understanding the power of the picture: the effect of image content on emotional and political responses to terrorism (2014, background): “Furthermore, research has shown that manipulating people’s appraisals of an event can shape their reported emotional reactions (e.g. Roseman & Evdokas, 2004).”
The Nature and Dynamics of Relevance and Valence Appraisals: Theoretical Advances and Recent Evidence (2013, background): “In addition to the systematic manipulation of specific appraisal checks (Ellsworth & Smith, 1988; Roseman & Evdokas, 2004; Smith, 1989; van Reekum et al., 2004), there are several established task paradigms, such as memory and selective attention tasks.”
Anxiety, Immigration, and the Search for Information (2014, background): “Anxiety occurs when individuals appraise a situation as being unpleasant, highly threatening, and uncertain (Lerner & Keltner, 2000, 2001; Roseman & Evdokas, 2004).”
An Arousal Regulation Explanation of Mood Effects on Consumer Choice (2012, unknown): “For example, both motivation (Martin et al. 1993; Raghunathan and Pham 1999) and cognitive appraisals (Lerner, Han, and Keltner 2007; Roseman and Evdokas 2004) can impact consumer choice.”
Explaining After by Before: Basic Aspects of a Dynamic Systems Approach to the Study of Development. (2005, background): “This is the central tenet of appraisal theory (Frijda, 1986; Roseman & Evdokas, 2004; Scherer, 1999).”
Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity (2008, background): “Much appraisal research has used responses to hypothetical scenarios or retrospective reports of memorable emotions (see Roseman & Evdokas, 2004).”
On the Causal Role of Appraisal in Emotion (2013, background): “Appraisals can be manipulated (a) indirectly via the manipulation of real (Roseman & Evdokas, 2004) or representational stimuli (e.g., pictures, scenarios; Robinson & Clore, 2001; C. A. Smith & Lazarus, 1993) in the hope that participants will appraise them in a certain way, or (b) directly, with…”
Cognitive Appraisals and Interest in Visual Art: Exploring an Appraisal Theory of Aesthetic Emotions (2005, background): “Appraisal theories are set apart from other theories because they assume that emotions come from evaluations of events (Lazarus, 1991; Roseman & Evdokas, 2004; Scherer, 2001; Smith & Ellsworth, 1985).”
Emotional Responses to Art: From Collation and Arousal to Cognition and Emotion (2005, background): “Common appraisal components include appraising something as being unexpected, relevant to a goal, controllable or uncontrollable, inconsistent with personal standards, and one’s own or another person’s fault (see Roseman, 2001; Scherer, 2001a; Smith & Ellsworth, 1985; Weiner, 1986).”
Vigor as a Positive Affect at Work: Conceptualizing Vigor, Its Relations with Related Constructs, and Its Antecedents and Consequences (2011, methodology): “The set of predictions presented below about vigor’s workrelated precursors could also have been based on appraisal theories of affective states, which have been widely used and consistently supported by empirical research (Roseman & Evdokas, 2004).”
Putting appraisal in context: Toward a relational model of appraisal and emotion (2009, background): “…at examining the degree to which appraisals are actually causal antecedents of emotion as hypothesised (Frijda & Zeelenberg, 2001; Parkinson, 1997; Roseman & Evdokas, 2004; Smith & Kirby, 2009); as well as the degree to which specific patterns of appraisal (e.g., other-blame) hypothesised to…”