How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization

By K. Chudoba. Information Systems Journal, 2005

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Management of Technology and Innovation, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9dc4290bfde1d5fe9b4484912d6ea23a09f0bc7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Saonee Sarker
2. V. Taras
3. J. Webster
4. Suprateek Sarker
5. D. Sandy Staples
6. Manju K. Ahuja
7. Fabian Jintae Froese
8. Peter R. Magnusson

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. V. Taras
2. J. Webster
3. Suprateek Sarker
4. D. Sandy Staples
5. Manju K. Ahuja
6. Saonee Sarker
7. Peter R. Magnusson
8. Sarah Kirkeby

In Social Psychology

1. V. Taras
2. J. Webster
3. Suprateek Sarker
4. D. Sandy Staples
5. Manju K. Ahuja
6. Fabian Jintae Froese
7. Daniel W. Baack
8. Saonee Sarker

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams (2008, methodology): “We also built on Chudoba et al. ’s (2005) to measure team time zone spread, change in team membership (team stability), the extent to which team members had not met face-to-face (lack of F2F knowledge), and the number of native languages represented within the team (language diversity). To examine s”
• Diverse effects of diversity: Disaggregating effects of diversity in global virtual teams (2019, background): “Technological development and greater global integration have led to an unprecedented rise of global virtual collaboration in the workplace (Chudoba et al., 2005; Martins et al., 2004).”
• The Role of Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams: A Social Network Perspective (2011, methodology): “, [17]), we used either a two-step or a three-step hierarchical regression to test the models.”