Culture in the Context of Intercultural Negotiation: Individualism-Collectivism and Paths to Integrative Agreements.
By Deborah A. Cai, Steven R. Wilson, Laura E. Drake. 2000
121 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c4c2a9b52811e51e74872d3a147998f3cfa63c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Social Psychology
- Michele J. Gelfand
- Miriam Erez
- Z. Aycan
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Rebecca J. Dumlao
- Sachiyo M. Shearman
- Sharon K. Parker
- R. Nouri
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists (2002, background): “Cai et al. (2000) argue that by seeking participants from a variety of nations, stronger conclusions can be made about the causal effects of collectivism.”
- The relationship between cultural values, cultural intelligence and negotiation styles (2019, unknown): “Given the fact that collectivistic individuals think “we” and behave in favor of their group, this orientation is crucial in fostering integrative, i.e., cooperative negotiations (Cai et al., 2000; Caputo, 2016; Traavik, 2011).”
- Tension and trust in international business negotiations: American executives negotiating with Chinese executives (2006, unknown): “…logistical difficulties of bringing large numbers of participants together from different countries, only a few studies have addressed intercultural negotiations in laboratory settings (e.g., Adler and Graham, 1989; Brett and Okumura, 1998; Pornpitakpan, 1999; Cai et al., 2000; Adair et al., 2001).”
- Cross-cultural organizational behavior. (2007, background): “Negotiator roles are more important for negotiation outcomes in hierarchical cultures (e.g., Japan) than in egalitarian cultures (Kamins et al. 1998; see also Cai et al. 2000).”