Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists
By Deborah A. Cai, Edward L. Fink. 2002
231 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd08adbaef661e4073778d62a2e5e818597d6279
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Qin Zhang
- Stella Ting-Toomey
- John G. Oetzel
- Yan Bing Zhang
- Sachiyo M. Shearman
- Mary Lee Hummert
- Rebecca J. Dumlao
- James T Harwood
In Sociology and Political Science
- Qin Zhang
- Stella Ting-Toomey
- John G. Oetzel
- Yan Bing Zhang
- Sachiyo M. Shearman
- Mary Lee Hummert
- Rebecca J. Dumlao
- James T Harwood
Citations in the corpus
- Face Concerns in Interpersonal Conflict (2003, result): “Limitations, Future Directions, and Conclusions Although the measures used in this study are beneficial for intercultural research from an etic perspective, recent research helps to demonstrate a concern with etic measurements that may also apply to this study (Cai & Fink, 2002).”
- A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Family Communication Patterns and Conflict Between Young Adults and Parents (2008, methodology): “Researchers examined the association between culture and conflict styles using IND-COL, self-construals, and face concerns.”
- Family Communication Patterns and Conflict Styles in Chinese Parent-Child Relationships (2007, background): “Research suggests that the meanings of conflict styles (except the competing style) are different for collectivists and individualists (Cai & Fink, 2002). ing the effects of family communication patterns on children’s conflict styles from the U.S. culture to non-U.”
- Perceptions of Conflict Management Styles in Chinese Intergenerational Dyads (2005, background): “…conflict management styles (competing, avoiding, accommodating, and problem-solving) have been identified with some consistency in prior research, and, as such, warrant consideration within the intergenerational communication context (Cai & Fink, 2002; Sillars, 1980; van de Vliert & Hordijk, 1989).”