Bilingual first-language development: Dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up*
By V. Gathercole, Enlli M. Thomas. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2009
430 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c3109568fa21b0257f8e9beb3428fa29f15fec3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- A. Sorace
- S. Unsworth
- S. Carroll
- K. Byers‐Heinlein
- Ianthi M. Tsimpli
- C. Muñoz
- Leonie Cornips
- A. Hulk
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender* (2012, methodology): “It is argued that the results are more consistent with a rule-based than a piecemeal approach to acquisition (Blom, Polišenskà & Weerman, 2008a; Gathercole & Thomas, 2005, 2009), and that non-target performance on the production task can be explained by the Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis…”
- Contrasting Effects of Starting Age and Input on the Oral Performance of Foreign Language Learners (2014, background): “…in the explanation of the asymmetries found in the rate of development of the dominant and the non-dominant language of bilinguals (Gathercole 2007; Gathercole and Thomas 2009; Paradis 2010; Hoff et al. 2012), although not all aspects of bilingual children’s development seem to be similarly…”
- The relationship between bilingual exposure and vocabulary development (2011, background): “Further, children are found to be much more likely to gain full mastery of the community language than of their minority home language (Gathercole & Thomas, 2009).”
- Dual language exposure and early bilingual development* (2011, background): “…is evidence that the degree of difference between monolinguals and bilinguals on these grammatical measures is related to the amount of English exposure the children have (Gathercole, 2002a; 2002b; 2002c; Gathercole & Thomas, 2009; Pearson, Fernández, Lewedeg & Oller, 1997; Oller & Eilers, 2002).”
- Interpreting the Early Language Trajectories of Children from Low SES and Language Minority Homes: Implications for Closing Achievement Gaps (2012, positive): “Studies in Wales have found that children who hear only Welsh at home catch up to monolingual Englishspeaking children in their English language skills by the age of 9 years (Gathercole & Thomas, 2009).”
- A working memory, not bilingual advantage, in controlled attention (2010, background): “Gathercole and Thomas ( 2009 ) have also shown that prior to the age of four, Welsh–English bilingual children lag behind in both vocabulary and grammar as compared to their monolingual peers.”
- Bilingual Language Acquisition (2011, background): “There is a huge amount of research into the consequences for language development and literacy of these different language backgrounds [e.g. Gathercole & Thomas, 2009; Tabors & Snow, 2001].”
- The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch (2011, background): “In this sense, then, it may be the case that it is amount of input over time which has a greater effect on the acquisition of gender in Dutch than the acquisition of gender in Greek (Gathercole & Thomas, 2009; Unsworth, under review).”
- Parental language mixing: Its measurement and the relation of mixed input to young bilingual children's vocabulary size* (2012, background): “There is evidence that patterns of language use by parents raising bilingual children can account for preschool and school-aged children’s active use of and proficiency in a minority language (De Houwer, 2007; Gathercole & Thomas, 2009).”
- Exposure and input in bilingual development (2017, methodology): “…relative to monolinguals on measures of grammatical knowledge, and these too correlate to measures of exposure (Gathercole, 2002a, 2002b, 2002c; Gathercole & Thomas, 2009; La Morgia, 2011; Paradis, 2010; Paradis & Navarro, 2003; Thomas & Gathercole, 2007; Thomas, Williams, Jones, Davies &…”