Secondary school pupils' satisfaction with their ability grouping placements

By S. Hallam, J. Ireson. 2007

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bd185052881a4daa0286eacc0a73640c5162e4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. P. Stevens
2. M. Van Houtte
3. Shaun D. Wilkinson
4. D. Penney

Citations in the corpus

• The effects of setting on classroom teaching and student learning in mainstream mathematics, English and science lessons: a critical review of the literature in England (2014, background): “Despite such ostensible aspirations, there is compelling evidence that setting allocation procedures may have counter effects, as they are biased against some groups of students (Hallam and Ireson 2007).”
• Study Involvement of Academic and Vocational Students: Does Between-School Tracking Sharpen the Difference? (2009, background): “Students are very aware of the relative lower status associated with being in a low-ability group (Abraham, 2008; Hallam & Ireson, 2007; Stevens & Vermeersch, in press).”