Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology

By E. Swanson, Neil C. Ramiller. MIS Q., 2004

887 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bd13fd62fc6cc40efb389317d90202efbe7432c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination (2011, background): “In addition , firms with a proactive IT stance are likely to mindfully manage IT innovations and avoid jumping on the bandwagon of " me too " best practices or industry fads ( Swanson and Ramiller 2004 ) .”
Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research (2009, methodology): “Several frameworks have been used to describe the process of IT innovation (Kwon and Zmud, 1987; Cooper and Zmud, 1990; Swanson and Ramiller, 2004).”
Informational Cascades and Software Adoption on the Internet: An Empirical Investigation (2009, background): “Herd behavior has also been observed in many cases of IT adoption in which investment decision makers follow the decisions of earlier adopters (Kauffman and Li 2003; Swanson and Ramiller 2004).”
Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of Information Technology Fashion on Organizations (2010, background): “of the differentiated destinies of IT, fashion seems to become a commonplace phenomenon in IT nowadays (Baskerville and Myers 2009; Swanson and Ramiller 2004).”
Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods (2004, background): “1 The ultimate goal of innovation research is to provide guidance to managers on the question of “ whether, when, and how to innovate with IT ” (Swanson and Ramiller, 2004).”
Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, Synthesis, and Directions for Future Research (2012, background): “These articles make an “off-the-shelf” reference to Cohen and Levinthal and often do not use the term “absorptive capacity” (e.g., Saeed et al. 2005; Swanson and Ramiller 2004).”
Digital innovation: A review and synthesis (2019, background): “Viewed in this way, organizations may indeed be following a rationale by seeking legitimacy in initiating digital innovation — although one that may oppose initiation based on local facts and specifics (Swanson & Ramiller, 2004) and thus represent a suboptimal decision.”
Computing (2021, methodology): “To identify if we could associate environmental characteristics to affective responses, we had to address two major tasks: (1) characterize the built environ ment and (2) measure spatially explicit affective responses to these characteristics.”
Organizing for Mindfulness (2006, background): “…(Weick & Roberts, 1993), reduce the likelihood and severity of organizational accidents (Weick et al., 1999), aid information system design (Swanson & Ramiller, 2004), produce creative solutions (Langer, 2005), heighten adaptation (Vogus & Welbourne, 2003), foster entrepreneurship (Rerup,…”
A critical review of cloud computing: researching desires and realities (2012, background): “Cloud computing desires: evidence from literature and practice When confronted by any potential innovation in computing, organisational decision makers are faced with a complex sense-making problem (Swanson and Ramiller, 2004).”
Information Technology Governance in Information Technology Investment Decision Processes: The Impact of Investment Characteristics, External Environment, and Internal Context (2008, background): “Brown 1997 Gosain 2004 Swanson 1997 Swanson and Ramiller 2004 Centralization The extent to which decision rights are concentrated at the top.”
Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing (2010, background): “Recently, there is a growing acknowledgment that IT innovation can directly influence the way firms innovate and thus create strategic disequilibrium in the market place (Fichman 2004; Lyytinen and Rose 2003; Swanson 1994; Swanson and Ramiller 1997, 2004).”
Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning (2006, background): “Feldman and Pentland 2003, Pentland and Feldman 2005), the existing literature on individual and organizational learning and cognition generally uses a dichotomy to portray mindful and less-mindful processes (e.g., Langer 1989a, Nelson and Winter 1982, Weick et al. 1999, Swanson and Ramiller 2004 )”
Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications (2010, background): “Prior research suggests that the ultimate goal of IS innovation research is to provide guidance to managers on the question of whether, when, and how to innovate with IS (Fichman 2004; Swanson and Ramiller 2004).”