The burdens of ownership: reasons for preferring renting
By Sabine Moeller, K. Wittkowski. 2010
319 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9946dbce336518604642f1318a3e22ab3c7297fc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Mareike Möhlmann
- Sheetal Jain
- Giana M. Eckhardt
- Sita Mishra
- S. Lawson
- Jiyoung Hwang
- Mark R. Gleim
- Rebeca Perren
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Sheetal Jain
- Sita Mishra
- S. Lawson
- Mareike Möhlmann
- Mark R. Gleim
- Rebeca Perren
- Jiyoung Hwang
- Giana M. Eckhardt
Citations in the corpus
- Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation (2017, unknown): “Similarly, Moeller & Wittkowski (2010), in a survey among users of an online peer-to-peer network, find no effect of environmentalism on preferring renting instead of owning good.”
- Is sharing the solution? Exploring public acceptability of the sharing economy (2018, background): “(2016) find that concern for the environmental and sustainability issues are an important motivation for many consumers, whilst other studies find little or no relationship between environmental values and attitudes towards sharing practices surrounding transport, accommodation or products (Bardhi a”
- Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption (2016, methodology): “…examining economic consciousness, environmental consciousness, status consumption, possessiveness, and materialism were deemed appropriate given the findings from the qualitative study and previous research (Durgee & O’Connor, 1995; Moeller & Wittkowski, 2010; Barhdi & Eckhardt, 2012; Belk, 2007).”
- Luxury fashion consumption in sharing economy: A study of Indian millennials (2020, methodology): “This finding is in line with Moeller and Wittkowski (2010) study that showed a negative link between experience value and preference for non-ownership.”
- Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing (2012, background): “Moeller and Wittkowski (2010) find different consumer preferences associated with possession versus access in a peer-to-peer-sharing online network.”
- How the burdens of ownership promote consumer usage of access-based services (2016, background): “A key point of distinction between ownership and access-based consumption is the so-called Bburdens of ownership^ (Moeller and Wittkowski 2010) or the risks and responsibilities that accompany ownership.”
- Access-Based Services as Substitutes for Material Possessions: The Role of Psychological Ownership (2020, background): “…the negative utility of material possessions (i.e., “burdens of ownership”; Schaefers, Lawson, and Kukar-Kinney 2016), arguing that consumers seemingly should prefer access-based consumption (e.g., Bardhi and Eckhardt 2017; Lamberton and Rose 2012; Lawson et al. 2016; Moeller and Wittkowski 2010).”
- The sharing economy: Your business model's friend or foe? (2016, background): “In addition, consumers are often faced with several risks and costs inherent with ownership, such as financial, performance, and at times even social hazards (Moeller & Wittkowski, 2010).”
- To have in order to do: Exploring the effects of consuming experiential products on well-being (2015, unknown): “Moreover, like material items, experiential products eventually deteriorate and need to be upgraded, maintained, or stored (Hellén & Gummerus, 2013; Moeller & Wittkowski, 2010), all of which may detract from the well-being they provide.”
- Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again (2015, background): “In fact, Moeller and Wittkowski (2010) found that consumers who seek to use trendy products were more likely to prefer sharing over ownership.”
- To earn is not enough: A means-end analysis to uncover peer-providers' participation motives in peer-to-peer carsharing (2017, background): “Generally, utilitarian motives seem to play a major role for explaining the use of access-based services (Bardhi and Eckhardt, 2012; Lamberton and Rose, 2012; Moeller and Wittkowski, 2010).”
- Contagious Effects of Customer Misbehavior in Access-Based Services (2016, background): “Yet, they are gaining relevance due to changes in consumers’ lifestyles and technological advancements (Bardhi and Eckhardt 2012; Moeller and Wittkowski 2010).”
- A decade of the sharing economy: Concepts, users, business and governance perspectives (2020, unknown): “Previous research on the users’ perspectives on the sharing economy has highlighted motivations of users to participate in various forms of sharing economy schemes (Bardhi and Eckhardt, 2012; Moeller and Wittkowski, 2010; M€ ohlmann, 2015; Tussyadiah, 2015), demographics of users (c.”