What cognitive intelligence is and what emotional intelligence is not.
By N. Brody. 2004
227 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9889a446f37cbe1396d02c531c97d0062d91a0c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Mayer
- Stéphane Côté
- M. Zeidner
- Peter Salovey
- C. MacCann
- Adrian Furnham
- Richard Boyatzis
- K. V. Petrides
Citations in the corpus
- Emotional Intelligence: Review of Research and Educational Implications (2007, background): “This is one of the reasons why cognitive ability researchers have either ignored or even condemned the notion of ability EI (e.g. Eysenck, 1998; Brody, 2004).”
- Emotional Intelligence: Toward a Consensus of Models and Measures (2010, background): “Brody (2004) has pointed out that emotion management tests tend to assess broad knowledge of how to manage emotional situations, but not the performance skills themselves.”
- Emotional Intelligence, its Measurement and Implications for the Workplace (2008, background): “Brody (2004) has questioned the predictive validity of MSCIET and ability tests of EI more generally, on the basis that they assess knowledge about emotions which may not necessarily mean that an individual has the ability to behave in accordance with that knowledge in real-time social situations.”
- Incremental validity of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT) after controlling for personality and intelligence (2009, background): “Despite the extensive amount of research on the ability model that has been conducted, Brody (2004) recently argued that ‘‘there is no convincing evidence that the MSCEIT provides incremental predictive validity over and above standard measures of intelligence and personality for important socially…”
- The science of emotional intelligence: Current consensus and controversies. (2008, methodology): “Brody (2004), for example, challenges the psychometric status and predictive validity of ability tests of EI.”
- Emotional Intelligence, Cognitive Intelligence, and Job Performance (2006, background): “There is a debate about the use of the term intelligence in emotional intelligence (Roberts, Zeidner, and Matthews, 2001; Becker, 2003; Brody, 2004).”
- Psychometric Properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) (2009, unknown): “The concept of emotional ‘‘intelligence’’ as a new cognitive ability is succinctly criticized in Brody (2004), while more detailed expositions of the flaws of the underlying scoring methods (‘‘consensus,’’ ‘‘target,’’ and ‘‘expert’’) are given in MacCann, Roberts, Matthews, and Zeidner (2004; see…”
- Trait Emotional Intelligence Theory (2010, background): “…to explore the conceptual flaws in the notion of EI as a hitherto undiscovered cognitive ability, the following references provide but a glimpse: Brody (2004); Eysenck (1998); Freudenthaler and Neubauer (2007); Keele and Bell (2008); O’Sullivan and Ekman (2004); Ortony, Revelle, and Zinbarg…”
- Ability and Trait Emotional Intelligence (2013, background): “Conceptual challenges like the foregoing (see also Brody, 2004 ; Locke, 2005 ) also give rise to a bewildering range of empirical limitations.”