Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EAP lessons and university lectures

By Joseph J. Lee, Nicholas Subtirelu. 2015

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/987f204ab2f3ccd31ffa91fad096578d37e0011c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Ken Hyland
2. Douglas Biber
3. Jim McKinley
4. Shih-Chieh Chien
5. A. Molino
6. R. Ruegg
7. Shulin Yu
8. Raffaella Negretti

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Ken Hyland
2. Raffaella Negretti
3. Douglas Biber
4. A. Molino
5. Jim McKinley
6. Shih-Chieh Chien
7. Paul Thompson
8. R. Ruegg

Citations in the corpus

• Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? (2017, background): “…have also been compared with classroom teaching, with teachers using metadiscourse more to explicitly frame the discourse to set up classroom tasks and create student involvement and the lecturers’ to establish relationships between ideas in the unfolding arguments (Lee and Subtirelu, 2015).”