Understanding Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Food: The Role of Values and Attitude Strength

By P. Honkanen, Bas Verplanken. 2004

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97a1ad357be36b24ee818b319f201f4dacfd375f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals (2014, unknown): “Importantly, this value structure not only appeared in Europe (De Groot & Steg, 2007, 2008, 2010; Grønhøj & Thøgersen, 2009; Honkanen & Verplanken, 2004; Nilsson, Von Borgstede, & Biel, 2004; Steg et al., 2005; Steg, De Groot, Dreijerink, Abrahamse & Siero, 2011; Steg et al., 2012), but also in…”
Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice (2006, background): “Attitudes are also embedded in or influenced by values (Johnson and Eagly, 1989; Feather, 1995; Honkanen and Verplanken, 2004 ).”
Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy (2008, background): “Honkanen and Verplanken (2004) distinguish between 'valence attitudes' that define the agreement with the product either favourably or unfavourably-from 'centrality attitudes', which consider the importance or relationship to values.”
Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro‐environmental behavior? (2009, methodology): “…beliefs and 62 Conservation Letters 2 (2009) 61–66 Copyright and Photocopying: c©2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. behaviors (Stern & Dietz 1994; Honkanen & Verplanken 2004; De Groot & Steg 2007), probably because many pro-environmental behaviors require individuals to restrain egoistic…”
The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions (2014, background): “…and biospheric values were positively related to proenvironmental beliefs, attitudes, preferences, and behaviors (e.g., De Groot & Steg, 2008, 2010; Honkanen & Verplanken, 2004; Nilsson et al., 2004; Nordlund & Garvill, 2002, 2003; Schultz & Zelezny, 1998; Steg et al., 2005, 2011; Stern, 2000;…”
Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions (2010, unknown): “…intentions and behaviours; altruistic and/or biospheric values show a positive relationship (e.g. Gärling, Fujii, Gärling, & Jakobsson, 2003; Honkanen & Verplanken, 2004; Milfont & Gouveia, 2006; Nordlund & Garvill, 2002; Stern & Dietz, 1994), probably because many pro-environmental…”
The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption (2009, background): “A significant link has been established in the extant literature between values and a wide range of consumer behavior: consumption of genetically modified food (Honkanen and Verplanken, 2004); energy conservation (Neuman, 1986); ethical consumption (Shaw et al.”