Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions

By J. D. de Groot, L. Steg. 2010

531 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f33aaad914a1ee85f627114d420ee690da2d6fee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Helping "light green" consumers walk the talk: Results of a behavioural intervention survey in the Swiss electricity market (2011, background): “Arguably, impure altruism is empirically more widespread than either pure altruism or pure egoism, and it has been demonstrated to be a significant predictor for pro-environmental intentions (De Groot and Steg, 2010).”
Further insights into perceived value and consumer loyalty: A "Green" perspective (2011, background): “De Groot and Steg (2010) argue that practitioners should promote pro-environmental preferences and intentions by making biospheric and altruistic values more salient in their intervention.”
Environmental psychology matters. (2014, background): “Personal norms represent one’s sense of moral obligation toward taking action, for example, to oppose nuclear energy (de Groot & Steg 2010), to reduce car use (Abrahamse et al. 2009), or to conserve water (Corral-Verdugo & Frı́as 2006).”
The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions (2014, methodology): “As in previous studies (e.g., De Groot & Steg, 2007, 2008, 2010; Steg et al., 2005), altruistic value items were substantially correlated with biospheric values and biospheric value items with altruistic values.”
Determinants and Measurement of Climate Change Risk Perception, Worry, and Concern (2017, background): “…but people (and therefore cultures) may prioritize these values differently (Steg & De Groot, 2012); and lastly, (c) these value scales have been reliably validated in a series of cross-cultural studies (De Groot & Steg, 2007, 2008, 2010; Schultz, 2001; Steg et al., 2011; Stern & Dietz, 1994).”
Environmentally active people: the role of autonomy, relatedness, competence and self-determined motivation (2016, background): “When considering that PEB are undertaken partly for the benefit of others (other people, other species, or nature at large; de Groot and Steg 2010), and depend on the participation of others for large scale success, we propose that the experience of relatedness could help to promote them.”
Intentions to make sustainable tourism choices: do value orientations, time perspective, and efficacy beliefs explain individual differences?† (2017, background): “Research has provided empirical support in regard to differentiating between the three value clusters (e.g. De Groot & Steg, 2007, 2008) and their predictive value for indicators of environmental engagement (e.g. De Groot & Steg, 2010; Khachatryan et al., 2013).”
Examining links from civic engagement to daily well-being from a self-determination theory perspective (2019, background): “However, a motivational explanation must be tempered by recognition that all behaviors, including helping and pro-environmental behavior, have diverse underlying motivations (e.g., de Groot & Steg, 2010; Weinstein & Ryan, 2010).”
Contrasting the nature and effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership (2017, unknown): “Following de Groot and Steg (2010), participants’ workplace pro-environmental behavior was measured by the percentage of money (out of $5) that they chose to donate to an environmental charity.”