Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro‐environmental behavior?

By J. D. de Groot, L. Steg. 2009

357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16e2b9d381773079a0c3f59effb96c088dd28534

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions (2010, background): “Interventions could try to make biospheric and altruistic values more salient in a specific situation, or to weaken the influence of egoistic values (De Groot & Steg, 2009).”
An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals (2014, background): “…can reduce environmental problems by engaging in pro-environmental actions (i.e., outcome efficacy): higher problem awareness is associated with stronger feelings of responsibility and higher outcome efficacy (De Groot & Steg, 2009; Gärling et al., 2003; Steg & De Groot, 2010; Steg et al., 2005).”
Pro-Environmental Behaviours and Value-Belief-Norm Theory: Assessing Unobserved Heterogeneity of Two Ethnic Groups (2019, background): “Awareness of consequences, ascription of responsibility, and personal norms are three variables of a norm-activation model that has been empirically validated by many studies [17,20].”
Motivational functionalism and urban conservation stewardship: implications for volunteer involvement (2012, background): “Making these egoistic functions (personal and social motivations) more cognitively accessible to volunteers does not conflict with the biospheric motivation to help the environment; they are all achieved by engaging in same activity—volunteering (de Groot & Steg 2009).”
Intentions to make sustainable tourism choices: do value orientations, time perspective, and efficacy beliefs explain individual differences?† (2017, background): “De Groot and Steg (2009) suggested two ways through which the cognitive accessibility of biospheric and/or altruistic values might be increased.”