Cogmed working memory training: Does the evidence support the claims?

By Zach Shipstead, Kenny L. Hicks, R. Engle. 2012

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/952250e40c41df6f5ed61d69f4a38bd0fa1059a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Daphne S. Ling
2. A. Diamond
3. J. Best
4. Claudia M. Roebers
5. Robin Jacob
6. Julia Parkinson

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Daphne S. Ling
2. A. Diamond
3. J. Matthews
4. M. Del Giudice
5. Ernst-Jan de Bruijn
6. G. Antonides

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. Daphne S. Ling
2. A. Diamond
3. J. Matthews
4. M. Del Giudice
5. Laura H. B. Dinehart
6. Ernst-Jan de Bruijn
7. G. Antonides

Citations in the corpus

• Conclusions about Interventions, Programs, and Approaches for Improving Executive Functions that appear Justified and those that, despite much hype, do not (2015, background): “…training methods that looked at benefits for EFs include: Au et al. (2015), Klingberg (2010), Kueider et al. (2012), MelbyLervåg and Hulme (2013), Morrison and Chein (2011), Shipstead et al. (2012), Spencer-Smith and Klingberg (2015), Spierer et al. (2013), and von Bastian and Oberauer (2013).”