A review of listening strategies: focus on sources of knowledge and on success.
By S. Graham, E. Macaro, R. Vanderplank. 2007
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/934567413c667c2be727d7f216529c6f694d67a5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Guangwei Hu
- Christine Goh
- E. Macaro
- Denise Santos
- S. Graham
- R. Vanderplank
- Larry Vandergrift
- Jeremy Cross
Citations in the corpus
- Strategy Instruction in Listening for Lower‐Intermediate Learners of French (2008, background): “Furthermore, whether successful learners use certain strategies because they have reached a higher level of proficiency or whether the use of those strategies has led to that higher level of proficiency is still contested (see, e.g., Macaro et al., 2007).”
- Listening Comprehension and Strategy Use: A Longitudinal Exploration. (2008, unknown): “In addition, it was considered to be important to compare two students who did not differ greatly in terms of their demonstrated linguistic knowledge since such knowledge is a likely variable in strategy use (see Macaro et al., 2007).”
- Exploring the relationship between listening development and strategy use (2011, background): “…does not fully reflect ‘internal reality’ (Seliger, 1983: 180), and there may be some forgetting of information regarding strategy use by learners as they complete the task which may in addition be distorted by the process of verbalization (for a more detailed discussion, see Macaro et al., 2007).”
- Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data (2014, background): “By relating learners’ overall MALQ scores to their listening scores, we sought a better understanding of how learners’ metacognitive awareness about listening may be a factor in their listening proficiency without suggesting a causal effect (see Macaro et al., 2007).”