Crossmodal spatial attention

By Charles Spence. 2010

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Multimodal Learning, Model Architectures

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. J. Bobis
2. Fang‐Tzu Hu
3. Paul Ginns
4. Fred Paas
5. Wayne Leahy
6. German Ignacio Parisi
7. Sharon K Tindall-Ford
8. Shirley Agostinho

In Social Psychology

1. German Ignacio Parisi
2. Stefan Wermter
3. Paul Ginns
4. Fred Paas
5. S. Howard
6. Peter König
7. Basil Wahn
8. Wayne Leahy

In Multimodal Learning

1. Stefan Wermter
2. German Ignacio Parisi
3. Paul Ginns
4. Christopher Kanan
5. Peter König
6. Basil Wahn
7. Kushal Kafle
8. Manoj Acharya

In Model Architectures

1. Christopher Kanan
2. German Ignacio Parisi
3. Stefan Wermter
4. Jose L. Part
5. Paul Ginns
6. Peter König
7. Basil Wahn
8. Ronald Kemker

Citations in the corpus

• Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Review (2018, background): “, & Spence, C. (2017). Assessing the role of the unity assumption on”
• Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning (2015, background): “combination of multisensory cues may capture spatial attention more effectively than unimodal cues (Spence, 2010), an investigation of the effects on learning of combining a pointing cue with cues in other modalities is clearly warranted.”
• Giving Learning a Helping Hand: Finger Tracing of Temperature Graphs on an iPad (2015, background): “Over the past decade, basic research on the neural basis of multi-modal perception and attention (e.g., Abrams, Davoli, Du, Knapp, & Paull, 2008; Cosman & Vecera, 2010; Spence, 2010; Shams & Seitz, 2008) has demonstrated the close connections between hand positioning and visually based cognitive pro”
• Attentional Resource Allocation in Visuotactile Processing Depends on the Task, But Optimal Visuotactile Integration Does Not Depend on Attentional Resources (2016, background): “However, given that a visual search task also involves a discriminative component, there is reason to believe that a visual search task and a tactile or auditory spatial task should not interfere with each other (Alais et al., 2006).”
• The Curious Incident of Attention in Multisensory Integration: Bottom-up vs. Top-down (2016, unknown): “…supposed to be an automatic and pre-attentive process, is apparently reduced when spatial attention is focused elsewhere (Santangelo et al., 2007; Spence, 2010; Van Der Lubbe and Postma, 2005) suggesting that exogenous orienting of spatial attention might act as a truly automatic mechanism only…”