Learning Styles and Adaptive Flexibility

By C. Mainemelis, Richard Boyatzis, David A. Kolb. 2002

318 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/926ab0b9aa5a128680625a64d6b80c31fd731f6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Andrew C. Corbett
2. F. Coffield
3. A. Mohr
4. Dirk Holtbrügge

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Andrew C. Corbett
2. F. Coffield
3. Keith M. Hmieleski
4. Robert A. Baron

In Social Psychology

1. D. Kayes
2. Andrew C. Corbett
3. F. Coffield

Citations in the corpus

• Experiential Learning within the Process of Opportunity Identification and Exploitation (2005, background): “Additionally, while the traditional view of experiential learning posits that each of us tends toward one preferred style, more recent speculation suggests a more complex approach (Kolb et al., 2000; Mainemelis et al., 2002).”
• Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review (2004, background): “In the final chapter of The learning styles helper’s guide (2000), Honey and Mumford provide some statistical data on the LSQ.”
• Website Morphing (2009, methodology): “In the next section we relax these assumptions to solve a partially-observable Markov decision process where we infer r and where the visitor may not see morph m for the entire visit.”
• Internal Validity and Reliability of Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory Version 3 (1999) (2005, background): “Researchers tend to agree that while the limitations of ipsative data should be taken into account when determining the internal characteristics of the LSI, factor analysis remains the preferred method for identifying internal validity of the instrument.”