Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility

By A. Chernev, S. Blair. 2015

594 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91025c8ee28aa5b286d0abc331f5b4820130458c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. S. Anderson-Macdonald
2. S. Vitell
3. S. Connors
4. Christopher S. Tang
5. Matthew Thomson
6. Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury

In Strategy and Management

1. Victoria D. Bush
2. Christopher S. Tang
3. Nilesh Khare
4. S. Anderson-Macdonald
5. Hau L. Lee
6. S. Connors
7. A. Alshehhi
8. Douglas W. Vorhies

Citations in the corpus

• Consumer Participation in Cause-Related Marketing: An Examination of Effort Demands and Defensive Denial (2018, background): “and Menon 1988), improved CSR perceptions, and better product performance evaluations independent of the firms’ actual ability (Chernev and Blair 2015).”
• The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate Financial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential (2018, background): “In stakeholder theory, fulfilling the requirements of stakeholders (environmental or social) contributes to financial performance [5].”
• Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies (2018, background): “Sherman [46] analyzed the sustainability reports and provided an overview of the Triple Bottom Line (TPL) concept and the way it changes how corporations report their CSR activities.”
• Overcoming the ‘Window Dressing’ Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility (2017, background): “Firms’ CSR activities have been shown to facilitate more favorable consumer responses (Brown and Dacin 1997) and product evaluations (Chernev and Blair 2015), increase consumers’ non-profit donation behavior (Lichtenstein et al. 2004), strengthen stakeholder relationships (Sen et al. 2006), and…”
• Socially and Environmentally Responsible Value Chain Innovations: New Operations Management Research Opportunities (2017, background): “3The notions of doing good and doing well capture the motivations for companies to create shared value between the poor and the firm, which is different from the context examined in the behavioral economics literature (e.g., Ariely et al. 2009, Chernev and Blair 2015).”