Regional Clusters: What We Know and What We Should Know
By M. Enright. 2003
410 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90f4a91ed5b2d453d5a673365c73c5a98e33ab56
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Michaela Trippl
- Franz Tödtling
- R. Hassink
- David Doloreux
- John H. Dunning
- Ron A. Boschma
- S. Jakobsen
- Hector Rocha
In Strategy and Management
- Michaela Trippl
- Franz Tödtling
- Joan Enric Ricart
- Hector Rocha
- John H. Dunning
- R. Hassink
- E. Pantaleoni
- S. Parto
Citations in the corpus
- New frontiers in international strategy (2004, background): “The ‘meso’-level effects are very much in the spirit of recent work on regional clusters, defined as groups of localized firms in the same and related industries, including buyers, suppliers, and industries related through shared resources or activities (Enright, 1998, 2003).”
- Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions ★ (2014, neutral): “…of innovation’ (Lundvall, 1992, 2012; Nelson, 1993; Freeman, 1997), ‘regional system of innovation’ (Cooke and Morgan, 1993, 1998; Cooke et al., 1997; Enright, 2003; Doloreux, 2002; Asheim and Gertler, 2005), and ‘learning region’ (Morgan, 1997), which emphasise the importance of the territorial…”
- Developing Biotechnology Clusters in Non‐high Technology Regions—The Case of Austria (2007, background): “Enright (2003) refers to such constellations as ‘‘potential clusters’’.”
- How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster (2005, background): “On the basis of theoretical thoughts on geographic clustering by Porter (2000) and Enright (2003), a rapidly increasing number of policy initiatives to support clustering of industries have been emerging in many countries of the world (see for instance Porter, 2000; Gordon & McCann, 2000; Cumbers &…”
- Creative clusters and city growth (2008, background): “But many regional clusters do not succeed, and many that do, do so for a time and then fail (Enright 2002).”
- Some macro-data on the regionalisation/globalisation debate: a comment on the Rugman/Verbeke analysis (2007, background): “Michael Porter's and Michel Enright's work demonstrates how subnational clusters of very specific economic activities can supply global markets (Porter, 1998; Enright, 2003).”
- Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues (2005, background): “Another unit of analysis is ‘the local’, which often refers to districts within cities or metropolitan areas [1,29,42,71].”
- Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective (II) - knowledge creation and growth in clusters (2005, background): “Porter (1990, 1998) distinguishes between the vertical and horizontal dimensions of clusters, a distinction which implies different competitive advantages for firms in the cluster (Maskell, 2001; Malmberg and Maskell, 2002; Enright, 2003).”
- Entrepreneurship and Development: The Role of Clusters (2004, background): “However, different answers to the question about clusters and firm performance might result according to the stage of the life cycle (Pouder and St John, 1996; Porter, 1998; Enright, 2001) as well as the degree of development (Arthur, 1990; Baptista and Swann, 1998; Enright, 2001; Porter et al., 200”
- Contests for Cooperation - A New Approach in German Innovation Policy (2005, background): “…importance of 6 For further information see www.unternehmen-region.de and www.diw.de/innoregio 8 location is the clustering of innovation activity found in many empirical studies.7 Clustering suggests that there are agglomeration advantages at work that stimulate R&D (Enright, 2003; Porter, 1998).”
- The complexity of innovation: A relational turn (2011, background): “Second, based on the results of these studies, policy recommendations are developed, more or less regardless of the dissimilarities between the various contexts that have been studied (Enright, 2003; Polt et al., 2001; Sölvell et al., 2003).”
- Individual Political Contributions and Firm Performance (2012, positive): “Our analysis derives from the geographic clustering of different industries (Glenn and Glaeser, 1997; Porter, 2000; Enright, 2003), which themselves fall into jurisdictions of different Congressional committees.”
- Managing innovation networks in the knowledge-driven economy (2004, background): “According to the degree of intervention, five different cluster development strategies can be differentiated (Enright 2001): .”
- Management control systems in innovation companies: a literature based framework (2014, background): “Research shows that companies that are part of a cluster tend to be more innovative and have higher growth rates than other companies in the same industry (e.g. Baptista and Swann 1998; Beaudry and Breschi 2003; Enright 2003).”