How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster

By R. Hassink. 2005

487 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1313a4f3df9bb641b712f2653f46b32c6fef51e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

What Kind of Entrepreneurship Drives Regional Development in European Non-core Regions? A Literature Review on Empirical Entrepreneurship Research (2013, background): “…hence, assures that organizations and regions successfully adapt to changing external conditions (Setterfield, 1993) which may avoid negative “lock-ins” (Grabher, 1993; Hassink, 2005; Lagendijk, 2000) and ultimately may lead to “positive” development paths of regions (Martin & Sunley, 2006).”
Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach (2019, background): “By contrast, the related concept of path dependence has been subjected to extensive theoretical and empirical scrutiny (Hassink 2005; Martin and Sunley 2006; Martin 2010).”
Barriers to Path Creation: The Case of Offshore Wind Power in Norway (2018, background): “Different types of pressures or disruptions can lead to negative path dependence (Martin and Sunley 2006), as witnessed in numerous old industrial regions that fail to deviate from established paths (Hassink 2005), but such factors may also trigger the initiation of new paths.”
Technological relatedness and regional branching (2009, background): “According to Grabher (1993) and Hassink (2005), such structures typically explain the inabilities of old industrial regions to successfully renew themselves.”
When Do Global Pipelines Enhance the Diffusion of Knowledge in Clusters? (2013, background): “Clusters can avoid lock-in through the creation and recombination of knowledge (Hassink, 2005), which can be produced through the bridging of unconnected knowledge networks (Glucker 2007).”
The Place of Path Dependence in an Evolutionary Perspective on the Economic Landscape (2010, unknown): “…and self-reinforcing growth of ‘high-tech’ clusters (see, for example, Grahber, 1993; Storper, 1995; Storper, 1997; Cooke and Morgan, 1998; Bode, 2001; Kenney and von Burg, 2001; Boschma, 2004, 2005; Bathelt and Boggs, 2003; Fuchs and Shapira, 2005; Gertler, 2005; Hassink, 2005a and 2005b).”
Some Notes on Institutions in Evolutionary Economic Geography (2009, background): “To avoid this situation of negative lock-in requires institutional change (Hassink 2005).”
Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience (2015, background): “What is more, their ability to diversify into new growth paths might be negatively affected by their specialized industrial structure (Boschma and Lambooy, 1999; Hassink 2005; Martin and Sunley, 2006).”
Lock-in or lock-out ? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience (2014, background): “Papers by Tödtling & Trippl (2004), Hassink (2005), Suire & Vicente (2009), Simmie & Martin (2010), Menzel & Fornahl (2010),”
Exploring evolutionary economic geographies (2007, background): “…D ow nloaded from and lock-in of inferior products and technologies (David, 1975, 1985; Arthur, 1983, 1989, 1994), path-dependence and lock-in have found analytical traction in a regional context (Grabher, 1993; Grabher and Stark, 1997; Storper, 1997; Boschma, 2004; Gertler, 2005; Hassink, 2005).”
What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy (2009, background): “they are normative in character, suggesting clear ‘policy principles’, or more analytical and explanatory, based on empirical analysis of real situations of regions without formulating policy advice (Hassink 2005).”
The Spatial Evolution of Innovation Networks: A Proximity Perspective (2010, background): “According to Grabher (1993) and Hassink (2005) , such structures typically explain the inabilities of old industrial regions to successfully renew themselves.”
A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process (2007, background): “…experience a negative lock-in: the inability to incorporate radical innovations leads firms and cities to accept only incremental innovations, the scope for which get depleted by saturing market demand (Anderson and Tushman, 1990; Grabher, 1993; Hassink, 2005; Wezel and Van Witteloostuijn, 2006).”