Contests for Cooperation - A New Approach in German Innovation Policy

By A. Eickelpasch, Michael Fritsch. 2005

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffb27ce4bc1c8e89babd6a29c9905895cfe7c227

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Franz Tödtling
2. Michaela Trippl
3. Tom Broekel
4. Heiko Bergmann
5. L. Klerkx
6. Christian Hundt
7. Uwe Cantner
8. Rolf Sternberg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Franz Tödtling
2. Michaela Trippl
3. F. Polzin
4. Barbara S. Grave
5. Tom Broekel
6. Rolf Sternberg
7. Uwe Cantner
8. Christian Hundt

Citations in the corpus

• Collaboration Intensity and Regional Innovation Efficiency in Germany—A Conditional Efficiency Approach (2012, background): “Some policy initiatives, like the BioRegio, InnoRegio or InnoNet in Germany, are however designed to stimulate collaboration among organizations within a particular region (see Eickelpasch and Fritsch, 2005).”
• The Climate for Entrepreneurship at Higher Education Institutions (2018, background): “2 implemented measures to improve their entrepreneurial climate with the aim of fostering the entrepreneurial propensity of students and researchers (Eickelpasch and Fritsch, 2005; Rasmussen and Borch, 2010).”
• Developing Biotechnology Clusters in Non‐high Technology Regions—The Case of Austria (2007, background): “…regions, the rise of biotechnology clusters is likely to follow a different development path, revealing a stronger role of policy (Dohse, 2000; Eickelpasch and Fritsch, 2005; Rosson and McLarney, 2005) and a higher importance of distant knowledge sources (Leibovitz, 2004; Rees, 2005a, b).”
• Picking the winner? Empirical evidence on the targeting of R&D subsidies to start-ups (2012, background): “However, the subsidy allocation process can also mobilize co-operative innovative activity and enable learning effects for policymakers when it is organized as a contest of initiatives for self-organized co-operation in R&D (Eickelpasch and Fritsch, 2005).”
• What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups (2016, background): “…have in recent years to a different degree adopted measures to increase the entrepreneurial propensity of their students, thereby creating more or less supportive contexts for starting a business (Eickelpasch & Fritsch, 2005; Hoppe, 2015; Kuratko, 2005; Walter, Parboteeah, & Walter, 2013).”
• The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks (2010, unknown): “The InnoRegio program tried to stimulate the formation of innovative networks that involved private firms as well as public research institutes (Eickelpasch, Kauffeld et al. 2002a, 2002b; BMBF 2005; Eickelpasch and Fritsch 2005).”
• Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: Exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries (2016, background): “Prior research also points out the relevance of selecting themost suitable financemechanisms for each type of project (e.g. subsidy, revolving fund, loan and so forth) (Eickelpasch and Fritsch, 2005).”
• Green product development: What does the country product space imply? (2018, background): “Previous studies show in fact that policy measures might not be equally effective for all green sectors in every country (Eickelpasch and Fritsch, 2005; Pack and Saggi, 2006; Huberty and Zachmann, 2011).”