OVER AND OVER AGAIN: COLLEGE STUDENTS' VIEWS OF NATURE OF SCIENCE
By F. Abd‐El‐Khalick. 2006
89 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8fa6e2ed59f8119809bcdc50893cd52bf5bdddcb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Education
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The Nature of Science and the Next Generation Science Standards: Analysis and Critique (2016, unknown): “A meta-analysis by Alshamrani (2008) which reviewed recommendations from multiple sources (Abd-El-Khalick, 2004; Abd-El-Khalick et al., 1998; Bell, 2004; Chen, 2006; Clough, 2000; Lederman, 1998; Lederman & Lederman, 2004; Liu & Lederman, 2002; McComas, 2004; Osborne, Collins, Ratcliffe, Millar, & D”
- Evaluating Instrument Quality in Science Education: Rasch‐based analyses of a Nature of Science test (2011, methodology): “, Abd-El-Khalick, 2006; Lederman, 2007; Lombrozo, Thanukos, & Weisberg, 2008; NRC, 1998; Rubba & Andersen, 1978; Wilson, 1954). The US National Science Education Standards (NSES; NRC, 1998) and Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS, 1993), for example, explicitly enumerate several NOS aspects of cen”
- The Development of Dynamic Inquiry Performances within an Open Inquiry Setting: A Comparison to Guided Inquiry Setting (2009, background): “‘Procedural understanding’ meets other NOS definitions: that, ‘‘science is the existence of the scientific method’’ and ‘‘experiments are a goal-oriented form of scientific observation’’ (Abd-El-Khalick, 2006; Khishfe & Abd-ElKhalick, 2002).”