Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center

By Fumihide Tanaka, A. Cicourel, Javier R. Movellan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007

469 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ebbd1d5f73f9abe336e8b8402c63375a01de1da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations (2020, background): “Children have a tendency to personify agents and treat them like humans [46,69,127], and generally perceive agents as being both friendly and trustworthy [46,141].”
Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning (2012, background): “From the observational study, we discovered signiﬁcant evidence on the socialization process between the children and the robot (Tanaka et al., 2007).”
Comparative Study on the Educational Use of Home Robots for Children (2008, unknown): “[8] Fumihide, T.”
Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey (2013, background): “Regarding age, younger children are more likely to engage with robots, possibly because they do not have any precon-ceptions of what a robot is supposed to behave, and they may see it simply as a very special/advanced kind of toy, as shown by the results of Tanaka et al. [71] and Kozima et al. [43].”
Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review (2018, result): “These studies found varying results, from a clear, short-lived novelty effect (Fernaeus, Håkansson, Jacobsson, & Ljungblad, 2010) to sustained interest over a period of 5 months (Tanaka, Cicourel, & Movellan, 2007).”
How to approach humans?-strategies for social robots to initiate interaction (2009, background): “INTRODUCTION Social robots have started to move from laboratories to real environments [11,17,27,28,32,34], where, a robot interacts with ordinary people who spontaneously interact with it.”
An affective guide robot in a shopping mall (2009, methodology): “Previous studies have revealed that social robots can be used as museum guides [5, 6], as receptionist for assisting visitors [26], as peer-tutors in schools [7], in the context of mental-care for elderly people [8], in autism therapy [9, 10], and child-care [11].”
Title of paper : KASPAR – A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research (2009, unknown): “, 2006; Kanda and Ishiguro 2005) or commercially available robots in an educational context (Tanaka et al., 2007).”
"Hey Google is it OK if I eat you?": Initial Explorations in Child-Agent Interaction (2017, background): “Tanaka found that children build relationships with these agents the same way that they build relationships with people [6].”
Robots in Society, Society in Robots - Mutual Shaping of Society and Technology as a Framework for Social Robot Design (2010, background): “Telepresence robots enable knowledge workers to be in multiple places at once [32,29]; companion and care-taking robots provide supervision and social interaction for children and the elderly [36,42]; robotic educational assistants assist teachers in busy classrooms [47,28]; and socially assistive r”