Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning

By Fumihide Tanaka, Shizuko Matsuzoe. J. Hum. Robot Interact., 2012

364 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85124ece20c4de430f66d735d045e619022ea517

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Science Applications

1. Elizabeth Broadbent

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. O. Oudgenoeg‐Paz
2. Rianne van den Berghe
3. S. V. D. van der Ven
4. Paul M. Leseman
5. Josje Verhagen
6. Elizabeth Broadbent

In Social Psychology

1. O. Oudgenoeg‐Paz
2. Rianne van den Berghe
3. S. V. D. van der Ven
4. Paul M. Leseman
5. Josje Verhagen
6. Elizabeth Broadbent

Citations in the corpus

• A review of the applicability of robots in education (2013, methodology): “On the other hand, the robot can take the role of co-learner, peer or companion and have active spontaneous participation [7] (where the focus was on cooperative learning with the Asimo robot) or even care receiver [22] (where children learnt English along the way as they taught the Nao robot).”
• Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review (2018, methodology): “A possible limitation of the study by Tanaka and Matsuzoe (2012) is that a human teacher was present in addition to the robot to teach children the L2 words.”