Global management competencies: a theoretical foundation
By J.J.L.E. Bücker, E. Poutsma. 2010
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e14e0f2cb215c0373165ad11a1e48b9e2505dd1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- N. Richter
- Nooria Yari
- Erik Lankut
- Ilan Alon
- Franziska Bergdolt
- Leah Wolfeld
- Brigitte Armon
- Joseph A. Rios
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- A systematic literature review on the definitions of global mindset and cultural intelligence – merging two different research streams (2017, methodology): “As there is a plurality of different concepts available which overlap to a substantial degree (Bücker & Poutsma, 2010a), a need to differentiate between specific competencies and demarcate their scope of application for cross-cultural (business) situations characterized by particular contexts and…”
- Global Leadership: A Developmental Shift for Everyone (2012, background): “…knowledge and competing frameworks for understanding MCE and managing paradoxes as well as leveraging others’ thinking about global leadership competencies along the way (e.g., Bird, 2008; Bücker & Poutsma, 2010; Fulkerson, 1999; Goldsmith, Greenberg, Robertson, & Hu-Chan, 2003; Stuart, 2009).”
- Cultural intelligence, global mindset, and cross-cultural competencies: a systematic review using bibliometric methods (2020, background): “…individual-level outcome) * Review (2) CQ (1) CQ, CC, GM (1) A review of measurement instruments of global management competencies (CC, GM and CQ) (Bücker and Poutsma, 2010a; see conceptualisation) * A review of the leadership literature of global teams (involving GM and CQ of leaders) (Zander…”
- Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016, background): “The results demonstrated that Byram’s (1997) definition of ICC, which focuses heavily on language proficiency, was the highest rated (M = 3.”