Expectancy-Value-Cost Model of Motivation

By K. Barron, Chris S. Hulleman. 2015

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d7a7b942e671232b9ea3679639af9fb81f12b18

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

More useful or not so bad? Examining the effects of utility value and cost reduction interventions in college physics. (2020, background): “This can reduce the likelihood that students will continue to take STEM courses and can lower their STEM course performance (see Barron & Hulleman, 2015, and Wigfield et al., 2017, for reviews).”
Student Motivation: Current Theories, Constructs, and Interventions Within an Expectancy-Value Framework (2016, background): “…review of the literature demonstrates, an expectancy-value framework serves as a conceptual umbrella under which other motivation theories and constructs can easily ﬁ t. Additionally, we have proposed a revised framework that includes cost as a separate, third component (Barron & Hulleman, 2015 ).”
The Self-Regulation-View in Writing-to-Learn: Using Journal Writing to Optimize Cognitive Load in Self-Regulated Learning (2020, background): “…as a third important core component that determines learners’ motivation in expectancy-value theories, in addition to expectancy (i.e., the extent to which learners believe they can succeed in a task) and value (i.e., that the respective task is important; see, e.g., Barron and Hulleman 2015).”
Motivation in transition: Development and roles of expectancy, task values, and costs in early college engineering. (2019, background): “…with prior findings that, among secondary students and undergraduates, positive motivational beliefs tend to gradually decline over time (Anderman & Midgley, 1997; Fredricks & Eccles, 2002; Jacobs et al., 2002; Kosovich et al., 2017) while perceived costs may increase (Barron & Hulleman, 2015).”