The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence
By Dale A. Koike, Lynn Pearson. 2005
244 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c7fa3bc3768ad57f40c543ea90b260c2f6e9ff6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
- K. Rajagopalan
- Masatoshi Sato
- Kazuya Saito
- R. Lyster
- Hossein Nassaji
- Naoko Taguchi
- S. Loewen
- Luke Plonsky
In Literature and Literary Theory
- K. Rajagopalan
- Masatoshi Sato
- Kazuya Saito
- R. Lyster
- Naoko Taguchi
- Hossein Nassaji
- S. Loewen
- R. Ellis
Citations in the corpus
- The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (2018, methodology): “We are using the term ‘construction’ in the former sense.”
- Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going (2015, methodology): “In House (1996) and Koike & Pearson (2005), the implicit group received conversation excerpts with target features embedded.7 The implicit condition (control group) in Félix-Brasdefer’s (2008) study had learners observe native speaker refusals and role-play situations.”
- Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms (2012, background): “First, when engaging in a task, learners tend to focus on task completion by using any kind of communication strategy, including body language, which can be followed by simple acknowledgments such as ‘yes’ or ‘no’ (Doyle 1983; Kormos 1999). Second, peer CF can be more face-threatening than teacher C”