Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes

By F. M. Van der Kleij, Remco Feskens, Theo J. H. M. Eggen. 2013

668 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bb421ee788113f3152eb5d3e442031e88fe2dad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Mark K. Ho
2. F. M. Van der Kleij
3. T. Griffiths
4. Erika A. Patall
5. Sandra Stautberg
6. Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
7. Carlton J. Fong
8. Ariana C. Vasquez

In Education

1. F. M. Van der Kleij
2. Ariana C. Vasquez
3. T. Griffiths
4. Erika A. Patall
5. Sandra Stautberg
6. Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
7. Carlton J. Fong

Citations in the corpus

• Learning Rewards from Linguistic Feedback (2020, background): “It is generally found to be the most effective (Shute 2008; Lipnevich and Smith 2009; van der Kleij, Feskens, and Eggen 2015; Hattie and Tim-perley 2007).”
• A Meta-Analysis of Negative Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation (2018, background): “Feedback was and still is one of the most powerful influences on learning (Hattie 2012; Van der Kleij et al. 2015), yet the question remains: What are effective ways of providing feedback to enhance intrinsic motivation?”
• Student perceptions of assessment feedback: a critical scoping review and call for research (2020, background): “As numerous reviews of feedback effectiveness demonstrate, positive effects of feedback on learning cannot be guaranteed (e.g. Kluger & DeNisi, 1996; Shute, 2008; Van der Kleij et al., 2015).”