The Evolution and Restructuring of Diversified Business Groups in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from Chaebols in Korea
By Hicheon Kim, R. Hoskisson, Laszlo Tihanyi, Jaebum Hong. 2004
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ba2c644be2b3ca23ac0fe5f6a114cc3e45f84d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mike W. Peng
- Andrew Delios
- R. Hoskisson
- Xufei Ma
- K. Meyer
- Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra
- Mike Wright
- Igor Filatotchev
In Economics and Econometrics
- Mike W. Peng
- Xufei Ma
- Andrew Delios
- R. Hoskisson
- Shaker A. Zahra
- Yuan Lu
- Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra
- Xiaotao Yao
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of state ownership and control mechanisms on the performance of group affiliated companies in China (2007, background): “Experiences from South Korea noted that with economic liberalization and diminution of governmental supports business groups were restructured by more focusing on core businesses (Kim et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2007).”
- Family ownership and R&D investment: The role of growth opportunities and business group membership (2015, background): “Business groups are also often involvedwith the investment decisions and resource allocations of each affiliate (Cuervo-Cazurra, 2006; Khanna & Palepu, 2000; Kim et al., 2004; Rajan, Servaes, & Zingales, 2000).”
- Business group affiliation and firm performance in a transition economy: A focus on ownership voids (2007, background): “Therefore, future research on business groups in other emerging economies and in the Asia Pacific region may examine more specific functions of the business groups under different institutional contexts (Ahlstrom & Bruton, 2004; Kim et al., 2004; Peng, 2002).”
- The Performance of Group‐affiliated Firms during Institutional Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Indian Firms (2009, background): “In particular, these findings indicate that some members enjoy more benefits than others depending on their power-dependence position in the group (Kim et al., 2004; Jameson et al., 2000).”
- What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective (2007, background): “…(2001, 2004), Makino and Beamish (1998), Makino and Delios (1996), Peng et al. (2001b) Delios and Beamish (1999, 2001), Geringer et al. (2000), Kim et al. (2004b) Malaysia Zin (1999) Singapore Lim and Teck (1995) Lin, Ping, and Chiu (2005), Rajan and Pangarkar (2000), Sim and Pandian…”
- Knowledge management and innovation strategy: The challenge for latecomers in emerging economies (2008, background): “The business-groups literature also focuses on the differences in the institutional contexts and sources of competitive advantages between advanced and emerging economies in explaining value-creating functions of business groups (e.g., Guillen, 2000; Khanna & Palepu, 2000; Kim, Hoskisson, Tihanyi, ”
- Business groups and their types (2007, background): “For example, studies have discussed how business groups are profitable (Khanna & Palepu, 2000a; Khanna & Rivkin, 2000) and how they alter diversification over time (Khanna & Palepu, 2000b; Kim, Hoskisson, Tihanyi, & Hong, 2004; Kosacoff, 2000).”
- From diversification premium to diversification discount during institutional transitions (2008, background): “As long as the state no longer provides preferential resources to conglomerates, conglomeration's benefits of overcoming imperfections in capital, product, and labor markets prevalent in emerging economies may decrease (Guillen, 2000; Kim et al., 2004).”
- Guest Editors' Introduction Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom* (2005, unknown): “Kim et al. (2004) and Toulan (2002), however, consider the drawbacks of diversification by business groups.”
- Diversified Business Groups and Corporate Refocusing in Emerging Economies (2005, background): “Thus, business groups may be able to forestall refocusing activity, relative to independent firms (Hoskisson, Cannella, et al. 2004) when faced with deregulation and increased competition from both foreign and domestic firms ( Kim et al., 2004 ).”