Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge

By Mohan Subramaniam, N. Venkatraman, Wallace E. Carroll. 2001

654 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b5cb28100d6cce1b6101aedfb174bc6abca3ba0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Intellectual Capital Profiles: An Examination of Investments and Returns (2004, background): “Subramaniam and Venkatraman (2001) , for example, empirically demonstrated how tacit as opposed to explicit knowledge contributes to the development of superior (i.e.”
A Typology of Reverse Innovation (2015, background): “This early phase is characterized by tacit (Polanyi, 1967) and often sticky (von Hippel, 1994) knowledge, which makes spatial transfers costly and time intensive (Subramaniam and Venkatraman, 2001).”
Repatriating knowledge: variables influencing the “transfer” process (2009, background): “As mentioned earlier, Subramaniam and Venkatraman (2001) and Fink et al. (2005) refer to the knowledge that repatriates gain as contextualized or embedded in the foreign country, marketplace and firm: it is therefore shaped in a different external environment and subject to norms, policies,…”
How social capital and knowledge affect innovation (2011, background): “This finding is relevant to knowledge research, as some researchers consider both dimensions as parts of a unidimensional construct (Polanyi, 1966; Subramaniam and Venkatraman, 2001).”
Learning from foreign subsidiaries: An empirical investigation of headquarters' benefits from reverse knowledge transfers (2006, background): “Capability-based theories and product innovation literature hypothesize that a higher degree of interaction between units leads to more familiarity, and subsequently to a better understanding of the knowledge transferred (Subramaniam & Venkatraman, 2001).”
Multinational Firm Knowledge, use of Expatriates and Foreign Subsidiary Performance (2010, neutral): “Thus, technological knowledge tends to be less dependent on location, requiring less modification when transferred across geographical boundaries (Kogut and Zander, 1992; Subramaniam and Venkatraman, 2001).”
The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities (2005, background): “Similarly, structured processes, such as new product development projects that harness and reinforce organizational knowledge, clearly benefit from rich exchanges of information and collaboration among a project's team members (Subramaniam & Venkatraman, 2001).”