Factual and evaluative approaches to modifying children's responses to violent television

By Amy I. Nathanson. 2004

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b1bc2f40a178d8b6578faae15e9b83507109ac8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Education

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Rules? Role Model? Relationship? The Impact of Parents on Their Children’s Problematic Mobile Phone Involvement (2019, background): “Such conversations should lead children to understand content, to form or change attitudes about, e.g., violent content and to facilitate media literacy (e.g., Austin, 1993; Cantor & Wilson, 2003; Fikkers, Piotrowski, & Valkenburg, 2017; Lwin, Stanaland, & Miyazaki, 2008; Nathanson, 1999, 2004).”
Parental Mediation of Children's Internet Use (2008, background): “Other researchers take a socio-cognitive approach, regarding parental mediation as stimulating the development of children’s media literacy which may, again, mitigate harmful media effects (Austin, 1993; Kunkel & Wilcox, 2001; Nathanson, 2004).”
Relation between active mediation, exposure to Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood, and US preschoolers’ social and emotional development (2016, methodology): “Nathanson (2004) argued that active mediation that encourages children to pay attention to certain aspects of programming may imply to the child that the content is “worth thinking about” (p. 332).”
Do You See What I See? Parent and Child Reports of Parental Monitoring of Media (2012, background): “…on children, including modifying undesirable responses to advertising (Buijzen, 2009; Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2005), news (Buijzen, Walma van der Molen, & Sondij, 2007), violent programming (Corder-Bolz, 1980; Nathanson, 1999, 2004; Nathanson & Cantor, 2000), and scary content (Cantor, 1994).”
The Boomerang Effect A Synthesis of Findings and a Preliminary Theoretical Framework (2009, background): “Nathanson (2004) argued that teaching facts about media production, such as “those people are just actors,” can cause some children (especially older, lighter viewers) to be more vulnerable to violent content after receiving the mediation compared to others who were taught to evaluate the…”
Parental Mediation of Undesired Advertising Effects (2005, background): “…of parental mediation depend on (a) child and family characteristics, such as children’s age and parents’ perceptions of television influence (Abelman & Pettey, 1989; Nathanson, Eveland, Park, & Paul, 2002); and (b) the content and form of the mediation (Nathanson, 2004; Nathanson & Yang, 2003).”
Children's Exposure to Negative Internet Content: Effects of Family Context (2005, background): “Recently, Nathanson (2004) showed that parental mediation through evaluation of violent program characters yielded positive outcomes among children (e.g., negative attitude toward violent programs and characters, less likeliness to justify violence, and less involvement with violent programs).”
Developing and Validating the Perceived Parental Media Mediation Scale: A Self‐Determination Perspective (2013, background): “…1977) and attitudes toward art and culture (Valkenburg, Krcmar, & De Roos, 1998), or reduce undesirable ones, including media-induced aggression (Nathanson, 2004), fear responses (Wilson & Weiss, 1991), parent–child conflict (Buijzen & Valkenburg, 2005), and alcohol use (Austin, Pinkleton, &…”