Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics
By V. Dawson, G. Venville. 2010
257 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8abe64dc8b242c79e378bb2ebca95434f26c2bc5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer (2014, background): “Along these lines, Dawson and Venville (2010) discussed four factors that they considered as important in quality argumentation.”
- The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students' argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science (2010, methodology): “In order to better determine the quality of informal reasoning used by the students in the arguments they generated on the survey (Research Question 2) a method previously used by Sadler and Zeidler (2005a) and Dawson and Venville (2009) was used in conjunction with the method described above to ass”
- Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand (2019, unknown): “The scientific process skills that students develop as a result of engaging in argumentation activities can help students to develop an understanding of the nature of science (Dawson & Venville, 2010).”