Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis : from thinking to interpreting to knowing
By M. Anderson. 2003
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8abbed89e6ab074431fc942f926691b72c5a78f5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Z. Fang
- Mary J. Schleppegrell
- William Nagy
- P. Uccelli
- S. R. Powell
- D. Townsend
- Eli Hinkel
- Wael Almurashi
Citations in the corpus
- Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings (2009, background): “objectification, the analogical dimension of gestures and bodily actions ( Lemke 2003; McNeill 2000) became qualified with cultural synthetic conceptual categories of language (e.g.”
- Language Correlates of Disciplinary Literacy (2012, background): “However, like science, mathematics texts are “semiotic hybrids” (Lemke, 1998, 2003); they draw on not only linguistic resources (i.e., natural language) but also symbolic and visual resources in the construction of mathematical meanings (O’Halloran, 2005).”
- Diagrammatic Reasoning as the Basis for Developing Concepts: A Semiotic Analysis of Students' Learning about Statistical Distribution (2005, unknown): “Whitson, 1997; Radford, 2000; Hoffmann, 2000; Anderson et al., 2003; and SáenzLudlow, 2003.”
- The Linguistic Challenges of Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Research Review (2007, background): “Lemke (2003) suggests that teachers should translate back and forth between the ordinary and technical language, embed the uses of mathematics in application contexts, and expose students to real out-of-school settings for use of mathematics (see also S aenz-Ludlow & Walgamuth, 2001).”