Probing Precarious Work: Theory, Research, and Politics

By A. Kalleberg, Steven P. Vallas. 2017

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8876d6bca5cee3b820bab1957039e84f7043e553

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Mindy K. Shoss

In General Health Professions

1. C. Rudolph
2. M. Kenny
3. Annamaria Di Fabio
4. Sabine Sonnentag
5. A. Hirschi
6. Florian Kunze
7. Mindy K. Shoss
8. Guido Hertel

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Mindy K. Shoss
2. H. Zacher
3. A. Hirschi

Citations in the corpus

• Expanding the Impact of the Psychology of Working: Engaging Psychology in the Struggle for Decent Work and Human Rights (2019, background): “…that the impact of precariousness at the workplace has an aversive effect on the capacity for work to fulfill natural strivings for selfdetermination, particularly for individuals who are marginalized from decent work (Blustein, in press; Kalleberg & Vallas, 2017; Parker, 2014; Ryan & Deci, 2000).”
• Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology (2020, background): “Moreover, precarious work is inequitably distributed, with marginalized populations being more likely to hold underpaid, insecure, and temporary positions (e.g., Kalleberg & Vallas, 2017).”