Men at Work and at Home: Managing Emotion in Telework
By K. Marsh, Gill Musson. 2007
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8735cd2734e684a05c22e84a2816de09de4fbcfc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Sociology and Political Science
- D. Miščenko
- M. Charalampous
- Wendy Wang
- Christine Grant
- Evie Michailidis
- Leslie Jordan Albert
- Debra A. Major
- Qinqin Sun
Citations in the corpus
- Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach (2018, background): “An alternative interpretation of emotions, based on narratives of three fathers, was that working from home could “provide a space where men can adopt the emotional discourses traditionally associated with women” (Marsh & Musson, 2008, p. 46).”
- Identity and identification at work (2016, result): “This proposition is further supported by the research on home-based work concluding that in this context both genders experience significant strain between their work and family identities (Marsh & Musson, 2008; Wilson & Greenhill, 2004).”
- Employee isolation and telecommuter organizational commitment (2020, background): “Such perceptions motivate managers and on-site coworkers to compensate for telecommuters’ absence with increased communications using ICTs (Marsh and Musson, 2008; Golden, 2006; and Leonardi et al., 2004).”
- Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work‐life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion (2010, background): “Working from home increases the permeability of work and personal life domains (e.g. Hartig et al., 2007; Marsh and Musson, 2008).”
- Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well‐being and work‐life balance (2017, unknown): “The prediction of border theory, then, is that remote working will heighten negative work-home spill-overs as suggested by several qualitative studies (Mirchandani, 2000; Crosbie and Moore, 2004; Marsh and Musson, 2008).”