Assessing the validity of measurement.

By F. Bryant. 2000

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87323fef68a13f5c8cdb224f39d0d7e9781e016c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Distinguishing Hope and Optimism: Two Sides of a Coin, or Two Separate Coins? (2004, background): “The difference in these two goodness-of-fit chi-square values provides a likelihood-ratio test of the hypothesis that the two second-order factors have different relationships with the given criterion factor (see Bryant, 2001; Bryant & Baxter, 1997).”
Do parents make a difference to children’s academic achievement? Differences between parents of higher and lower achieving students (2005, background): “Finally, it identifies the strength of each of the constituent items in reflecting the relevant content domain, as well as the strength of the relationship between content domains (Bryant, 2000).”
The Relationship of Young Children's Motor Skills to Later School Achievement (2006, methodology): “Predictive validity generally implies the degree to which an instrument of interest provides accurate measurement by comparing scores 756 Merrill-Palmer Quarterly from the instrument with scores on a relevant criterion variable of later development (Bryant, 2000).”
The measurement of classroom management self‐efficacy: a review of measurement instrument development and influences (2011, background): “Although subjective (Bryant, 2000), content validity was most commonly determined by SE scale authors alone, with as few as one-third seeking expert review by academics or experienced teachers.”
The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intention and human capital (2018, background): “Discriminant validity is the extent to which the measures of different concepts are distinct (Bryant, 2000).”
Teachers’ Characteristics and Attitudinal Beliefs About Linguistic and Cultural Diversity (2009, methodology): “In addition, factorial-content validity was determined employing exploratory factor analysis (Bryant, 2000).”
Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and Methodology (2009, methodology): “As Bryant (2000) effectively put it for the assessment of a trait, Imagine, for example, that you created an instrument to measure the extent to which an individual is a “nerd.””