Individual differences and their effects on formulaic sequence acquisition
By Z. Dörnyei, V. Durow, K. Zahran. 2004
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/870d5cbf3db8f062c1db86fbfa8977dc73bcd0a5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- M. Garnier
- N. Schmitt
- B. Fernández
- E. Peters
- Stuart Webb
- Lars Stenius Stæhr
- A. Pellicer‐Sánchez
- Eva Puimège
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Picking up polysemous phrasal verbs: How many do learners know and what facilitates this knowledge? (2016, result): “As mentioned in our literature review, a more accurate predictor of formulaic language knowledge might be the degree of sociocultural adaptation, leading to a better quality of L2 exposure (Adolphs & Durow, 2004; D€ ornyei et al., 2004). Unlike L2 instruction and L2 immersion, the effect of L2 engag”
- How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have?: the effects of frequency and amount of exposure (2015, background): “It has also been proposed that formulaic sequences are so closely related to everyday target language that cannot be learnt most efficiently unless the learner is immersed in the L2 culture and involved in the life of the L2 community (Dörnyei et al., 2004: 87).”