Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving: differences between immediate and delayed ratings

By Annett Schmeck, Maria Opfermann, Tamara van Gog, Fred Paas, Detlev Leutner. 2015

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/870ae6874fe888478c9b8ae43b595d769e804665

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Ø. Anmarkrud
2. Ivar Bråten
3. Brian Y. Lim
4. Ashraf Abdul
5. Anette Andresen
6. Helge I. Strømsø
7. Patricia A. Alexander
8. O. Solheim

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ivar Bråten
2. Brian Y. Lim
3. Anette Andresen
4. Ø. Anmarkrud
5. O. Solheim
6. Jason A. Chen
7. Krista R. Muis

Citations in the corpus

• COGAM: Measuring and Moderating Cognitive Load in Machine Learning Model Explanations (2020, methodology): “The user is then asked to rate the mental effort to read the visualization on a 7-point Likert scale on the next page [51].”
• Cognitive Load and Working Memory in Multimedia Learning: Conceptual and Measurement Issues (2019, methodology): “Studies that have compared immediate and delayed ratings of cognitive load have consistently found that delayed ratings yield ratings higher than the average of repeated immediate ratings made during problem solving (Schmeck et al., 2015; van Gog et al., 2012).”