Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents.

By Juliana Raskauskas, Ann D. Stoltz. Developmental Psychology, 2007

1,051 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86fc3c43657e9fb2011fa5bd01c29cd074ce9e33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

What Makes a Bully a Cyberbully? Unravelling the Characteristics of Cyberbullies across Twenty-Five European Countries (2013, background): “Cyberbullies state that these provide a means to display their technological skills (Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007), or to hold high information and communication technology (ICT) ability beliefs (Vandebosch & van Cleemput, 2008).”
Risk Factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies, and bully-victims (2012, neutral): “These findings were not supported by Raskauskas and Stoltz (2007), who found that traditional victims were not more likely to bully electronically, but rather to also be victimized by electronic means.”
Going Cyber: Using Routine Activities Theory to Predict Cyberbullying Experiences (2012, methodology): “In their discussion of cyberbullying, Raskauskas and Stoltz (2007) note victims may also experience heightened anxiety, depressive symptoms, and a lowered sense of self-worth.”
Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values (2012, background): “On the other hand, it has been found that most cyberbullies also use more traditional forms of bullying (Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007).”
Unwanted Online Sexual Solicitation and Risky Sexual Online Behavior across the Lifespan (2010, background): “Second, literature on offline solicitation (Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007) and on offline sexual risk behavior shows that adolescents are involved in those behaviors more often than adults are (Greene, Krcmar, Walters, Rubin, & Hale, 2000; Igra & Irwin, 1996; Steinberg, 2007, 2008).”
Interventions to Prevent and Reduce Cyber Abuse of Youth: A Systematic Review (2011, neutral): “…studies from approximately 10–35% (Agatston, Kowalski, & Limber, 2007; Hinduja & Patchin, 2008; Kowalski & Limber, 2007; Li, 2007; Patchin & Hinduja, 2006; Williams & Guerra, 2007), although some research has found significantly higher rates (Juvonen & Gross, 2008; Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007).”
Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? (2008, background): “Raskauskas and Stoltz (2007) surveyed 84 students from two high schools in the USA, aged 13‐18 years, on experiences of three types of cyberbullying over the last school year; 49% reported being electronic victims (compared to 71% being traditional victims; these high figures stem from including “1”
Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. (2007, background): “%) based on only 84 adolescents 13–18 years of age [27].”
Cyberbullying in College (2014, background): “Cyberbullying manifests through four primary forms: chat rooms, instant messaging, emails, and text messaging (Diamanduros, Downs, & Jenkins, 2008; Finn, 2004; Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007; Smith et al., 2008; Willard, 2004).”
Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. (2008, background): “In line with Raskauskas and Stoltz (2007), we found that cyber victims had also often been traditional victims, and cyber bullies had often been traditional bullies; but as Table 2 indicates, many traditional victims or bullies were not cyber victims or bullies, since cyberbullying is substantially ”