Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying.

By K. Williams, N. Guerra. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2007

1,029 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/326113cf373bf6ad9233b143182fc0ed7117125c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health (2013, result): “…is similar to other studies where males reported cyberbullying others more frequently than females (Li, 2006; PopovicCitic et al., 2011; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004) but contrary to other studies which have found no gender differences for cyberbullies (Hinduja & Patchin, 2008; Williams & Guerra, 2007).”
Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by bullies: A pilot study (2012, neutral): “…2004) differences, links between traditional bullying and cyberbullying (e.g., Gradinger, Strohmeier, & Spiel, 2009), impact (e.g., Ortega, Elipe, MoraMerchan, Calmaestra, & Vega, 2009; Raskauskas, 2010; Smith et al., 2008) and predictors of cyberbullying behaviour (e.g., Williams & Guerra, 2007).”
Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: a regional census of high school students. (2012, background): “Studies have found that anywhere from 9% to 40% of students are victims of cyberbullying, and most suggest that online victimization is less prevalent than are school bullying and other forms of offline victimization.(8,9) Strikingly few reports provide information on youths’ involvements in bullyin”
Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions (2014, background): “…on “normative beliefs” actually investigate adolescents’ own beliefs regarding the acceptability of the behaviour (which would be considered their attitude in the TPB) and not the perceived acceptability of this behaviour by important reference groups (Williams & Guerra, 2007; Wright & Li, 2013).”
Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. (2012, neutral): “For example, research has shown that cyberbullies tended to also be traditional bullies (Smith et al., 2008; Williams & Guerra, 2007).”
Cybercrime detection in online communications: The experimental case of cyberbullying detection in the Twitter network (2016, background): “These studies contend that cyberbullying behavior decreases along with increasing age, and that the rate of cyberbullying behavior is highest among teenage users (Slonje & Smith, 2008; Williams & Guerra, 2007).”
The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying (2014, background): “It usually occurs within the social context of peer group interactions (Williams & Guerra, 2007).”
Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Suicide (2010, methodology): “…15– 35% of students have been victims of cyberbullying while about 10–20% of students admit to cyberbullying others (Hinduja & Patchin, 2007, 2008, 2009; Kowalski, Limber, Scheck et al., 2005; Kowalski & Limber, 2007; Li, 2007a, 2007b; Patchin & Hinduja, 2006; Williams & Guerra, 2007).”
Reducing Bullying: Application of Social Cognitive Theory (2014, background): “Studies suggest that students holding antibullying attitudes are significantly less likely than those holding probullying attitudes to perpetrate bullying behaviors (Boulton, Trueman, & Flemington, 2002; Poteat, Kimmel, & Wilchins, 2010; Salmivalli & Voeten, 2004; Williams & Guerra, 2007).”
Cyberbullying in Greek Adolescents: The Role of Parents☆ (2014, background): “…results of prior research which suggest that cyberbullying is no gender-determined (Beran & Li, 2005; Dilmac, 2009; Hinduja & Patchin, 2008; Mishna, Cook, Gadalla, Dacink, & Solomon, 2010; Slonje & Smith, 2008; Ybarra, Diener-West, & Leaf, 2007; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004; Williams & Guerra, 2007).”
An Analysis of Bullying Among Students Within Schools: Estimating the Effects of Individual Normative Beliefs, Self-Esteem, and School Climate (2011, background): “…research demonstrating a negative association between school climate and bullying perpetration (i.e., Craig & Pepler, 1997; Nansel et al., 2001; Williams & Guerra, 2007), as well as a positive relation between normative approval of bullying and involvement in bullying behavior (i.e., Huesmann…”
Gender and Adolescent Development. (2011, background): “Males and females participate about equally in electronic aggression, as both perpetrators and victims (Hinduja & Patchin, 2008; Williams & Guerra, 2007).”