Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils.

By Peter K. Smith, Jessica Mahdavi, M. Carvalho, S. Fisher, Shanette Russell, Neil Tippett. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 2008

3,410 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db97019df094c8bf3900bcecd13f81771035829f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship? (2016, background): “It typically comprises face-to-face confrontations and physical assault, as well as indirect acts of aggression, such as gossiping and the spreading of rumors (Olweus, 1993; Smith et al., 2008).”
Psychological Needs as a Predictor of Cyber Bullying: A Preliminary Report on College Students (2009, background): “Harman, Hansen, Cochran and Lindsey (2005), Li (2006), and Smith et al. (2008) report similar findings in their studies.”
Detection and Fine-Grained Classification of Cyberbullying Events (2015, background): “…et al., 2010; Hinduja and Patchin, 2012; Slonje and Smith, 2008), the identiﬁcation of different forms of cyberbullying (O’Sullivan and Flanagin, 2003; Vandebosch and Cleemput, 2009; Willard, 2007) and the consequences of cyberbul-lying (Cowie, 2013; Price and Dalgleish, 2010; Smith et al., 2008).”
Cyberbullying as an Act of Revenge? (2010, background): “Given that cyberbullying can be regarded a covert form of psychological bullying (Smith et al., 2008), it make sense to assume that it is driven by a similar set of motivations as traditional bullying.”
Cyber-Aggression: Definition and Concept of Cyberbullying (2010, background): “…receiving unwanted aggressive messages (Smith, Mahdavi, Carvalho, Fisher, Russell et al., 2008; Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2008), happy slapping (Smith et al., 2008); flaming (Gillespie, 2006; Smith et al., 2008), sexting (Bocij & McFarlane, 2003; Gillepsie, 2006; Spears, Slee, Owens, &…”
Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions (2014, methodology): “…(e.g., age, gender; Kowalski & Limber, 2007; Wade & Beran, 2011), personality traits (e.g., selfcontrol, narcissism; Pornari & Wood, 2010), involvement with traditional bullying and cyberbullying (Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007; Smith et al., 2008) and ICT-use (Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2009).”
Cross-Cultural Differences in Cyberbullying Behavior (2014, neutral): “…(e.g., Beran & Li, 2006), China (e.g., Li, 2009), Singapore (e.g., Ang, Tan, & Mansor, 2010), Turkey (Cetin, Yaman, & Peker, 2011), England (e.g., Smith et al., 2008), Switzerland (Perren, Dooley, Shaw, & Cross, 2010), Spain (Calvete, Orue, Estevez, Villardon, & Padilla, 2010), and other…”
A Comparison of Preservice Teachers’ Responses to Cyber Versus Traditional Bullying Scenarios (2014, background): “In the present study, we follow previous studies that have directly compared the two broad classes of bullying because such comparisons provide a context that helps us understand the growing phenomenon of cyber bullying and how pre- and serving teachers may be helped to deal with it effectively (Bou”
Cyberbullying: A Review of the Literature. (2013, background): “Smith et al (2008) found in line with Raskauskas and Stoltz (2007), that cyber victims had also often been traditional victims, and cyberbullies had often been traditional bullies; many traditional victims or bullies were not cyber victims or bullies, since cyberbullying is substantially less…”