A game theory approach for the allocation of risks in transport public private partnerships

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Preferred risk allocation in Chinas publicprivate partnership (PPP) projects (2010, methodology): “Recent researchers have been adopting more complicated and vigorous methods in the risk allocation arena, such as game theory (Medda, 2007), etc., instead of qualitative analyses that were used in earlier research work.”
Critical success criteria for public-private partnership projects: international experts’ opinion (2017, background): “For effective risk management to be realised, risks (i.e. both country and project risk factors) have to be properly identified using different identification mechanisms including brainstorming, cause and effect diagram and project analogy (Ozdoganm, Birnogul 2000; Medda 2007).”
Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Comparative Study (2010, unknown): “Recently, research on the risk allocation in PPP projects were observed in the publications by Abednego and Ogunlana 2006 , Medda 2007 , Ng and Loosemore 2007 , and Lam et al. 2007 .”
Empirical Study of Risk Assessment and Allocation of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China (2011, unknown): “…and Mohamed (1999) Kumaraswamy and Zhang (2001) Grimsey and Lewis (2002) Li et al. (2005) Warburton and Baker (2005) Shen et al. (2006) Maslyukivska and Sohail (2007) Ng and Loosemore (2007) Estache et al. (2007) Medda (2007) Zou et al. (2008) Total number of hits of a certain risk factor 19.”